Patient intake has no self-hosted data control
A native form submits to a connected email with no way to reconfigure where the data ultimately lands, a narrower option than even a WordPress plugin offers.
Everything below is ours and on our servers. Nothing follows you to another site.
Who
How we work
Rebuild
FROM WIX AND SQUARESPACE · MEDICAL CLINICS
A native form on Wix or Squarespace submits patient data to a connected email with no self-hosted control over where it actually goes, and assigning per-specialty durations across multiple doctors is unwieldy enough in the native booking interface that clinics commonly give up and collapse it into one shared calendar. Neither closed platform allows the server-side logic a clinic eventually needs for a real patient portal or EMR connection.
WHAT ACTUALLY BREAKS
Data handling, per-doctor booking and closed-platform limits, not generic site-builder complaints.
A native form submits to a connected email with no way to reconfigure where the data ultimately lands, a narrower option than even a WordPress plugin offers.
Assigning different durations per specialty across multiple doctors is unwieldy in the native booking interface, and clinics commonly give up on it.
Neither platform easily supports a genuinely filterable table without custom code, which both restrict by design.
No site-wide way to keep a compliance detail synced, so it drifts out of date on whichever page nobody remembered to update.
A clinic wanting a patient portal or an EMR connection eventually hits a hard wall, since neither platform allows real server-side custom logic.
WHAT CARRIES ACROSS
Content and data-handling are separate problems, migrated separately.
Every specialty page and doctor profile carries across intact. What does not carry across is how intake and booking were handled: a closed-platform form and a collapsed calendar are rebuilt into secure intake and real per-doctor availability.
WHAT IT COSTS
A range, not a fixed price, because doctor and specialty count move the number.
Depending on doctor and specialty count.
From brief to launch.
The single most consequential thing to fix, since neither closed platform ever offered it.
HOW IT RUNS
Intake security and booking structure audited first, since that is where the actual risk sits.
We check exactly where patient data currently lands, and how bookings are actually split, or not split, by doctor.
Every specialty page is mapped against Search Console, so any earned traffic is not lost in the move.
Each doctor gets real availability, patient history stops landing in an unmanaged inbox, and specialties become real indexable pages.
Every specialty and service URL redirected to its new address, with Search Console watched daily for the first two weeks after launch.
STRAIGHT ANSWERS
The ones that come up before anyone signs anything.
Structurally similar, and in one way worse: a native form on these platforms submits to a connected email with no self-hosted control over where that data ultimately lands, compared to at least being able to reconfigure a WordPress plugin's notification settings.
Wix Bookings supports staff members, but assigning different service durations per specialty across several doctors becomes unwieldy in the native interface, and clinics commonly give up and fall back to one generic calendar.
The same static-content problem as anywhere else, made worse because neither platform easily supports a genuinely searchable, filterable table without custom code injection, which both restrict.
Between
Two days, no charge, no obligation, and you keep the report whether or not you hire us.
One tap, then your app opens with it written.