"Unlimited revisions", never actually unlimited
Sounds generous, but a project drifts indefinitely, or a quiet limit gets enforced once patience runs out, never written down.
VIRTUAL STUDIO · REVIEW ROUNDS
Three, agreed before anyone starts
A review round is one pass of feedback on a milestone: a client reviews what was delivered, requests changes, and the team makes them. Every milestone carries a maximum of three, written into the agreement before work starts, not negotiated once it is already underway.
Prototype, example data WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE
Tracked against the milestone, visible as it is used
Not a promise trusted to memory.
Prototype, example data Review rounds used on this milestone2 OF 3
Review rounds sit in the stage bar of each milestone, next to the design and build steps.
THE RANGE OF PRACTICE
What an undefined limit looks like, and what a written one looks like
Described by behaviour, not by a score.
A "reasonable amount" of feedback
Nobody knows what reasonable means until a disagreement happens, at which point it is negotiated under pressure instead of agreed calmly in advance.
Three rounds, agreed before work starts
Both sides know the number going in, and the count used so far is visible in the workspace at any time.
WHY THREE
It protects your budget and our schedule equally
A number chosen deliberately, not a default nobody questioned.
Fewer rounds risks getting feedback wrong the first time under pressure to finish. Unlimited rounds risks a project that never actually ends, with the cost absorbed quietly by whoever is paying for the team's time. Three is enough to genuinely correct course twice while still forcing real decisions early, for both sides.
STRAIGHT ANSWERS
Questions about review rounds
The ones that come up before anyone signs anything.
One pass of feedback on a milestone: a client reviews what was delivered and requests changes, the team makes them, and that is one round used. Three are available per milestone, agreed before work starts.
"Unlimited revisions" sounds generous and is not. It usually means a project drifts indefinitely while the team absorbs the cost quietly, or a limit gets enforced anyway once patience runs out, just never written down. Three, agreed in writing before the work starts, protects a client's timeline and our schedule equally, because both sides know the number in advance.
It is scoped and priced separately, agreed explicitly rather than absorbed silently. That keeps the first three rounds meaningful: real budget was allocated to get feedback right within them, not to defer decisions past them.
No. Rounds are attached to the milestone they were agreed for, not banked for later use elsewhere. A milestone approved on the first pass simply used one of the three available, not all of them.
See how review rounds are tracked, before you commit
A read-only demo workspace is open to browse, no account needed.